Guardian Newspaper Criticizes Responsible Gambling Trust ‘Conflict of Interest’

Guardia<span id="more-814"></span>n Newspaper Criticizes Responsible Gambling Trust ‘Conflict of Interest’

Neil Goulden claims that industry involvement in research is vital to the understanding of problem gambling and to the ongoing work of the RGT.

Neil Goulden, head of the Responsible Gambling Trust (RGT) in the UK, has been called away by Britain’s Guardian newsprint for an apparent conflict of passions.

As seat for the RGT, Goulden presides throughout the country’s leading charity specialized in minimizing problem gambling, and yet he could be additionally a previous seat regarding the Association of British Bookmakers ABB), an industry lobby group.

The positions were held simultaneously between 2012 and mid-2014.

Goulden’s affiliations to both groups are no secret, of course; being a previous board member of Ladbrokes and former president of the Gala Coral Group, he is very much indeed a public face of the gambling industry.

But, while the Guardian opined this week, the reality that RGT is chaired with a doyen of the industry and funded by donations from gambling companies raises questions about its integrity plus the nature that is balanced of research.

As well as money education, prevention, and treatment services for problem gamblers, RGT commissions research devoted to broadening the understanding of problem gambling problems.

But because of its affiliations, does it avoid asking the questions that are really tough the industry, and it is its research system totally independent of industry interests?

Goulden Responds

When contacted by the Guardian, Goulden insisted that his position as an industry insider, and the participation of the industry as whole, is, in fact, integral to researching and problem gambling that is ultimately understanding.

‘[The gaming industry] would not need released information or have taken the actions it continues to take prevention of harm without my influence that is personal and,’ he said. ‘i have continually urged the industry to do more to protect at-risk customers also to share practice that is best and to better communicate what they are doing and its effect.

‘True harm minimization can only be fully effective if it engages utilizing the industry and that the 100,000 people used in the industry take their social obligations seriously,’ he continued.

‘The present RGT research has offered clear pointers to anyone committed to reducing damage and the subsequent actions taken by the us government, the regulator and the industry have dramatically reduced volumes from the number of at-risk customers.’

FOBT Criticism

But, the RGT has been criticized by anti-gambling groups for its failure to condemn great britain’s notorious fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs), prevalent in high-street bookmaking shops across the nation.

These machines have been dubbed ‘the split cocaine regarding the street that is high because they enable clients to bet up to £100 ($146) every 20 seconds on digital casino games like roulette.

‘RGT refused to address the question that is key of FOBTs cause gambling related harm as a result of their addictive characteristics,’ complained a representative for the Campaign for Fairer Gambling, of a RGT study on the subject, published in 2013 when Goulden ended up being chair of both the RGT and ABB.

‘We are worried that the seat of the trust had been busy devising lobbying strategies for the bookmakers to enhance their image when this research was first established. This needs to be looked at.’

Goulden reacted that the extensive research questions associated with the 2013 research had been devised by the UK Gambling Commission and the Minister for the Department of heritage, Media and Sport, and included he had no influence on the commissioning, presentation, or interpretation of the findings.

New Lithuanian Gambling Regime Promises ‘Serious’ Crackdown on Unlicensed Market

Lithuanian President Dalia GrybauskaitÄ—, who finalized the online gambling reforms into law last summer. (Image: grybauskaite1.lrp.lt)

Lithuania gets tough on unlicensed online gambling operators. New powers engendered by the nation’s recent gambling reforms allow the ministry of finance to take stringent measures against offshore companies offering gambling that is illegal Lithuanian residents.

The gambling regulator (GCA) has warned it will just take ‘severe action’ against unlicensed websites.

From January 1st, all banking institutions, from banks to cost providers, are now actually legally bound to refuse transactions related to illegal online gambling.

Meanwhile, GCA has new abilities to issue legally binding orders to network service providers to block usage of gambling that is offshore.

GCA has used a blacklist of internet sites non grata, a list that will probably expand since it seeks to widen the net over ‘gambling operators whom organize remote gambling illegally and target the Republic of Lithuania.’

Network providers that fail to relax and play by the new rules face hefty fines.

Pressure from EU

‘These modifications to legislation have been commonly publicized and will be strictly lawfully enforced,’ Virginijus Dauksys, director of the GCA, stated. ‘Gaming operators require to be licensed to run within the Republic of Lithuania,’ he added.

Lithuania ended up being one of six EU member states chastised by the European Commission in 2013 for its failure to regulate online gambling, and the united states’s reforms are very much an effect of EU pressure.

The regime that is new which started its doors to certification on January 1st, is comparable to that of Belgium in that it takes that an operator must be integrated being a company in Lithuania while having issued share capital of at the very least €1.1 million ($1.18 million). Remote gaming licensees should also partner with a current land-based casino in the united states.

Expansion To Be Tightly Controlled

Lithuania previously had no measures in spot to legislate for remote gambling, and so the reforms that are new be viewed as progress, but the EU, along with its insistence on free movement of solutions across borders, is still likely to disapprove for the restrictiveness of its licensing requirements.

On signing the reforms into law last summer, Lithuanian President Dalia GrybauskaitÄ— warned that gambling activities will never be promoted and gambling expansion would be tightly managed.

Hence, without much scope for marketing or advertising, it will likely be difficult for operators to determine themselves into the market and for gamblers to distinguish between the licensed and markets that are unlicensed.

It also remains to be seen exactly how many international operators will seek to base their businesses in the country, as needed by the new law.

A GCA spokesperson told TotallyGaming.com on Wednesday that it had so far received only one application for licensing while the licensing window has admittedly been open for just one week.

Steve Wynn Reportedly Interested in Building North New Jersey Casino

Steve Wynn is allegedly interested in returning to northern nj and building the first non-Atlantic City gambling resort, some 30 years after he left the Garden State, vowing never to return. (Image: bloomberg.com)

Steve Wynn folded on his Golden Nugget Atlantic City property in 1987 and vowed to never go back to the ‘corrupt and stupid’ East Coast mecca that is gambling. But now one state legislator says the casino billionaire is interested in returning to nj-new jersey.

Wynn isn’t looking at the resort that is struggling he departed from nearly 30 years ago.

Instead, he’s eyeing North Jersey across the Hudson River from Manhattan.

Wynn would like to be the first company to build a gambling facility in the region.

Assembly Speaker Vincent Prieto (D-District 32) told NJ.com, ‘I have talked to many individuals that have expressed interest in coming to New Jersey. Mr. Wynn is one of those people.’

Politics as typical

Prieto isn’t alone in wishing to bring gambling north and out of this isolated coastline town. His legislative counterpart, State Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-District 3), agrees that allowing resort casinos to use closer to New York City would create thousands of jobs and generate millions in new revenue for Trenton.

But the two Garden State legislators disagree on who ought to be permitted to possess and manage the North Jersey properties.

Sweeney wants to mandate that to enable a company to be granted one for the New that is northern Jersey licenses, the organization must currently operate in Atlantic City. Prieto is prepared to stick to that demand for one casino, but not both.

‘We have people that spent hundreds of dollars in Atlantic City,’ Sweeney said. ‘Steve Wynn left New Jersey.’

Assemblyman Ralph Caputo (D-District 28) says Sweeney’s decree is flawed in reasoning. ‘Why would we exclude a person like Steve Wynn? I’d be disappointed whenever we … excluded people of his caliber.’

Steve Wynn the most names that are notable the gambling industry, even though their company presently only maintains four properties, two in vegas and two in Macau.

Ending Monopoly

If you have ever participated in a game of Monopoly, you understand how excruciatingly difficult it could be for the game to arrived at a close. That is also the instance for monopolies in real life.

The properties on the monopoly that is original game are centered on roads in Atlantic City, the town that has held an actual monopoly on casino gambling in the state since 1976.

It absolutely was 40 years ago that New Jersey legalized gambling, but voters chose to limit gaming to only Atlantic City at that time. Since then, the presssing issue of expanding gambling has repeatedly been presented in the state legislature and on ballots.

The Meadowlands Sports Complex in East Rutherford is probably the most location that is likely a northern Jersey gambling facility. Accompanied with a horse racetrack, MetLife Stadium and basketball arena, the $3.5 billion Xanadu Meadowlands retail and entertainment destination ground that is broke early 2000s.

The mammoth project, which included an indoor ski slope, spurred one controversy after another. From its aesthetically unpleasing exterior colors to the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, the investment company that was bankrolling the project, Xanadu stays under construction and under a fresh title, now dubbed the United states Dream Meadowlands.

Gambling into the north counties of New Jersey no longer seems to be described as a dream, but the procedure of awakening the market is yet to be decided by the state Legislature.